Alternative To Code42, CrashPlan On-Premise Backup

Regardless of the size of any organization, businesses cannot afford downtime due to changes in licensing policies of their cloud service providers. Moreover, as backup solutions have to work in tandem with different parts of an organization, changes associated with on-premise backups can be devastating for backup-intensive operations.

The last couple of months have been full of speculation, discussions, and disappointments on Reddit and other technology support forums. Some backup solution providers surprised enterprises with their licensing policies not supporting premise backup, forcing them to move their sensitive, confidential data to the cloud. There were also speculations about CrashPlan licensing changes that left many enterprises wondering if they will be forced to migrate to the cloud? Such abrupt changes to the licensing policy could have a negative effect on your business, particularly if you?re in the business of providing backup service to your clients.

Many service providers rely on third-party software to provide services. A sudden change in the licensing policy of the software hurts the company's reputation. End-users are not safe from sudden licensing policy changes, especially those related to on-premise backups. Such changes can be devastating for end-users as they affect operations while increasing downtime and costs. Therefore, organizations should remain prepared with an alternative plan to find the best way forward during such policy changes. This article could be your first step towards finding a secure remote backup solution provider and an alternative to Code42/ CrashPlan.

Expectations From an Ideal Private Cloud Backup Solution

Though some organizations are migrating to the cloud, the benefits of having on-premise backup solutions cannot be overruled. Some of the key benefits of an on-premise solution such as:

  • Complete control over the security of your valuable data
  • There is no need to pay storage fees to a cloud service provider
  • Network bandwidth is not metered or charged based on ingress or egress traffic
  • Ability to restore client?s data physically because stored data is usually closer to the enterprise periphery
  • In short, companies can keep the generated revenue for themselves rather than sharing it with the software vendor

There are specific standards of services that organizations expect from private cloud service providers. For instance, they do not need a pricing model that requires setup, bandwidth, and recurring fees while facing size limitations. On the other hand, a pricing model that only requires organizations to pay once while backing up data without any constraints is an advantageous option. To reduce backup time and bandwidth, organizations find transferring only modified data within a file better than moving the entire file. Therefore, solutions that carry out delta backups intelligently are the need of the hour. Also, securing communications with HTTPS protocol, encrypting file transfers using SSL, and additional protective measures, such as ransomware protection, help organizations stay safe with multiple layers of security. Besides, the best backup solutions run on any operating system and do not require additional configuration.

Risks and Challenges with Sudden Licensing Change

Following areas can be impacted when there is a sudden licensing policy change about supporting or not supporting on-premise backups:

1. Immediate Need of IT Expertise:
A change in licensing policy not to support on-premise backups leaves end-users to fend for themselves, having to look for viable alternatives in a short time. An extreme licensing policy change that might include a lack of on-premises backup support will create enormous IT expertise issues for organizations that can even lead to an indefinite downtime.

2. Financial and security risks
If end-users find themselves amid immediate licensing policy modifications, it will be difficult for them to implement those changes on time. And if organizations are left to fend for themselves, the security and financial risks will be massive as the changes add significant complexities.

A Comparison of CrashPlan vs. Syncrify

The following section discusses a brief comparison of Syncrify and CrashPlan. It highlights the significant differences where either one edges out the other:
Feature CrashPlan Syncrify
Free usage Paid only Free for personal use
Licensing Model Monthly subscription Perpetual license
Backup Destination 100% Cloud On-premise with option of public cloud
Synchronize Multiple Machines No. Just backups Yes, Synchronize multiple machines with each other
Direction Only client-to-server Client-to-server, server-to-client and two-way-sync
Encryption In-transit and at-rest In-transit and at-rest
Synchronize Multiple Machines No. Just backups Yes, Synchronize multiple machines with each other
Encryption In-transit and at-rest In-transit and at-rest
Restore from anywhere Yes Yes

Final Words

Companies can change their licensing policies regarding on-premise backups anytime. End-users should keep themselves updated about such discussions on official sites and online forums. In case of such a policy change, organizations looking for an on-premise backup solution similar to CrashPlan may find Syncrify as a great CrashPlan alternative. Syncrify has an excellent on-premise backup option that enterprises can fall back on if their CSP withdraws on-premise backup support. Syncrify has positioned itself as a reliable backup and synchronization solution with excellent features and a simple pricing model. Users prefer it for its reliable customer support, unique features and functionalities, and several other benefits it offers, such as on-premise backup support, which other CSPs have started to withdraw.


Social Media

Powered by